<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Perceptual Edge Discussion Forum</title>
	<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com</link>
	<description>Perceptual Edge Discussion Forum</description>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
	<item>
		<title>Clearquest</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3788791</link>
		<description>It's a software development defect tracking tool that found&amp;nbsp;its way into our company to help track a major project.&amp;nbsp; While its&amp;nbsp;intent may be clear, the output is a tad foggy ...&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I was able to show the people involved an alternative display that does a better job, but Clearquest defaults aren't all that adjustable.&amp;nbsp; Might be a great defect tracker, but it is not a defect reporter!&lt;BR&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38049&quot;&gt;Examples of bad graphs and dashboards&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3788791</guid>
		<pubDate>Thur, 05 Nov 2009 16:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>wd</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Yet another review request</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3775361</link>
		<description>&lt;font face=&quot;Verdana&quot;&gt;The attached dashboard shows the at risk sectors for the Road Safety Authority. When the report loads it defaults to showing year to date, the user can then use the menu to choose a different end date. As this is targeted to Israeli users, everything is in Hebrew and the date menu is on the right. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The labels on the right are the names for each metric. The underlined labels are drillthroughs that open related reports. Eventually they will all have related reports.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The numbers, going from right to left are: No Greater Than (can't use the word target), Selected Period, Difference of Target and Selected Period, Previous Period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The line graphs specs are: Black is selected period, gray is previous. The chart always shows a 12 month period. Right now it shows December-November. So the gray December is actually for December 2007. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Cognos does not yet include bullet graphs I'm using Google charts. The limit line is always two thirds in. The dark gray bar shows the value for the previous year. Any time a metric exceeds the limit a red dot appears next to it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It took a lot convincing to get the users to agree to &quot;ugly&quot; dashboards, but I think they see the difference. This gives me a little more maneuverability when it comes to designing effective reports. So please feel free to rip this to shreds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;-Paul&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38053&quot;&gt;Dashboard design&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3775361</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>PaulM</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Homeland Security Cybersecurity Center</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3772791</link>
		<description>Today the NYTimes showed a photo in their &quot;Pictures of the Day&quot; section of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center. The dashboard in the background jumped out for all the wrong reasons. There must be a 3D mandate for &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bit.ly/2ycOPL&quot;&gt;all Homeland Security graphs&lt;/a&gt;. Someone, please rush the Department of Homeland Security copies of all of Stephen Few's books, especially Information Dashboard Design!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John C. Munoz&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bzintelguru.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bzintelguru.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38049&quot;&gt;Examples of bad graphs and dashboards&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3772791</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>jmunoz</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Fundamental Differences in Analytical Tools</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3768863</link>
		<description>In his September/October 2009 article, titled &quot;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/differences_in_analytical_tools.pdf&quot; target=_blank target=_blank&gt;Fundamental Differences in Analytical Tools: Exploratory, Custom, or Customizable&lt;/A&gt;,&quot; Stephen explained that there are three basic categories of analytical tools, each intended for a specific audience and suited for specific types of analytical tasks. Do you agree? Is there something you'd like to add?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;-Bryan  &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=84290&quot;&gt;Articles by Stephen Few&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3768863</guid>
		<pubDate>Thur, 29 Oct 2009 16:37:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>bpierce</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Please Critique my Dashboard</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3768241</link>
		<description>Hi, I have done a simple 'dashboard' showing the results of an annual survey and I was hoping you'd provide some constructive criticism. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I used MooD software, which has&amp;nbsp;poor charting functionality, so I can't change the colours and don't have much control over labels in the line graph.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The little blue triangles indicate where users can drill down (to historic data)and I am not able to remove them.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I did consider only showing RAG icons for the red (and amber?) measures but I'm not sure how that would go down (they like to see green!).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyway, please be gentle as I am a sensitive soul!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Sarah&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38053&quot;&gt;Dashboard design&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3768241</guid>
		<pubDate>Thur, 29 Oct 2009 12:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>smbradbeer</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Info Vis history on Flickr</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3762272</link>
		<description>This morning I stumbled across a tweet about a cool info vis book. I just had to check it out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The book, titled &quot;Graphic Presentation&quot; and written by Willard Brinton is 70 years old.  I was surprised to find so much good stuff in the book, but maybe I shouldn't have been. In the days before computers and Excel, when making a chart took a serious investment in time, the majority of chart makers really thought about their craft. Contrast that to today, when making a chart in Excel consists of hitting the F11 button, so easy, even a caveman can do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of my favorite images from the book is below. At first, I couldn't figure out the order of the regions on the chart on page 143, but then it hit me. Can you figure it out? In addition, the use of small multiples on the bar charts on 142 makes it easy to compare across the categories. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Flickr stream, belonging to Prof. Michael Stoll, can be viewed &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bit.ly/4xkABB&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and the entire book can be downloaded (low res, sorry), &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bit.ly/221U6A&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John C. Munoz&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bzintelguru.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bzintelguru.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=63850&quot;&gt;Visual narrative&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3762272</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>jmunoz</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Bowling Alone chart</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3740427</link>
		<description>From Robert Putnam's &lt;u&gt;Bowling Alone&lt;/u&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot;&gt;In addition to the 3-D,&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot;&gt; the chart does not   &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; display meaningful data: the most important data (changes over time) are actually represented by the arrows on the bars, not by the   &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;  &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; height of the bars).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot;&gt;The chart is not self-explanatory  .&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Comic Sans MS&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot;&gt;Attached a revised chart based on what data could be gleaned from the text.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;--gary klass&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38049&quot;&gt;Examples of bad graphs and dashboards&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3740427</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>gmklass</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Bullet Graph Generator available - Open Source</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3739226</link>
		<description>I'm happy to announce that The Bullet Grapherator is ready for public exposure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An Open Source project creating Bullet Graphs in PNG, JPEG, and SVG formats, it's online at: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://kenai.com/projects/bulletgrapherator&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kenai.com/projects/bulletgrapherator&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://kenai.com/projects/bulletgrapherator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://kenai.com/projects/bulletgrapherator/pages/GettingStarted&quot;&gt;GettingStarted&lt;/a&gt; for instructions on how to get it. (The zip file is a bit too big for attaching here, I think)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In its current form there's a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://kenai.com/projects/bulletgrapherator/pages/TheDesigner&quot;&gt;Designer&lt;/a&gt; within which you can configure your Bullet Graphs to a reasonable degree, with much more configuration flexibility in store. Once designed, individual Bullet Graphs can be stored as templates, which can then be loaded and supplied with the variable business data to be displayed. There's no well-defined boundary as to what this will be, but it's a good bet that it'll include the upper and lower limits, the performance value, the comparison value, and less frequently the qualitative ranges. All of these can be provided programmatically when rendering updated BGs with new data for inclusion in your dashboards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Grapherator started as a way to automate the creation of SVG Bullet Graphs. As things got more involved incorporating PNG and JPEG format generation seemed only right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Grapherator is written in Java, and so is most naturally used in Java environments. Which means that it can be slotted into Java-based web apps pretty easily, although there's work to be done to expose the programmatic API better - it's still pretty ad hoc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My hope is that The Grapherator will prove to be useful, and that there will be enough interest in it to make it worthwhile to continue to working on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, please take a look and let me know what you think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Be kind, but honest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pictures attached.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38052&quot;&gt;Visual data analysis software&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3739226</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>ChrisGerrard</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>We are what we eat</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3715985</link>
		<description>Here's are some tastefully designed cupcakes, with the exception of the two pie cakes and the heavy tick marks on the axes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Original photo &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://twitpic.com/lapuk&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=63850&quot;&gt;Visual narrative&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3715985</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>jmunoz</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>To Radar Graph or not to Radar Graph...?</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3701347</link>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I'm currently working on neighbourhood&amp;nbsp;(N'hood) area profiles&amp;nbsp;for our&amp;nbsp;city - the city is made up of 43 neighbourhoods.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;We've created different thematic baskets which are made up of various KPIs.&amp;nbsp; Each of these thematic baskets has an overall score - the closer this score is to 100 the&amp;nbsp;more deprived&amp;nbsp;the area.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;One of things that we are looking at in these profiles is to do a comparison between a N'hood, the City and the best N'hood (i.e. the least deprived n'hood overall).&amp;nbsp; The idea is that people who live in these neighbourhoods can see how poorly their neighbourhood is doing and then challenge their local politicians to improve theses areas.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It had been suggested that using a radar graph would easily allow members of the public to compare their N'hood with the city average and the best N'hood.&amp;nbsp; However this has come under some criticism from several senior analysts as they feel that it would confuse members of the public too much.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Having reviewed some of the literature on the area and looked at the suggestions from Mr Few in the Examples area of the website.&amp;nbsp; I've come up with some alternatives and was wondering whether I could get your opinions on what is most suitable.&lt;/P&gt;I'm a relative newbie - but I feel that the radar graph although not as clear as&amp;nbsp;some of the others&amp;nbsp;still provides the best overall picture of things in terms of what we are trying to do.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Awais&lt;BR&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38296&quot;&gt;Graph design&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3701347</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>quetzalc0atl</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Real time, real bad dashboard</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3700803</link>
		<description>How do companies sell this stuff? Or maybe the better question is, who buys this garbage?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.xcendgroup.com/images/real-time-dashboard-anim.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If fitting the minimum amount of information on a dashboard was their intent then they've done a great job. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope that the folks at Xcend see this link from Stephen Few's website and do some reading up on how to make a great dashboard. Or better, engage  him to train their dashboard design team on how to make a great dashboard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What a pity that their money and time  is going into such an awful product. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John C. Munoz&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bzintelguru.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bzintelguru.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38049&quot;&gt;Examples of bad graphs and dashboards&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3700803</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:37:11 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>jmunoz</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Newbie question about rates.</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3700101</link>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a newbie question :)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to show a variation rate over 2 years (08-09).&lt;BR&gt;The result in 08 is negative, let say -100 and the result in 09 is positive (+50).&lt;BR&gt;The variation rate is (50 - - 100)/-100 = - 150%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that a negative number which raise have a negative rate, &lt;BR&gt;but when I show the -150% in the dashboard, people naturally think&lt;BR&gt;that there was a drop instead of a raise, even if the real numbers are written just beside :)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a standard (or elegant) way to handle these cases ?&lt;BR&gt;(for now I put a note beside the result to indicate that the negative rate means a raise in numbers)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks you :)&lt;/P&gt;Alain&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38053&quot;&gt;Dashboard design&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3700101</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>metasystem</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Brain Rules-what we pay attention to</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3698101</link>
		<description>Let's have some fun here. Back in August Stephen Few wrote about the book Brain Rules, and how it should be required reading in the Information Age. As usual, Stephen is right on, what a book!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me share with you a quote from Dr. Medina concerning visual processing in our brain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Here's what the brain loves more than anything else, it wants a rotating, moving, three dimensional image. The last thing we pay attention to is a a static, non-moving visual image.&quot; This quote was taken from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://bit.ly/4piRK&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; at 3 minutes 4 seconds. The entire 7 minute video is well worth watching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of us on this board make static, non-moving visual images for our livelihood. Some even sell wonderful books filled with insightful examples of them. Nevertheless, I wonder, is there a way to apply what Dr. Medina is telling us to our craft? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of us here are familiar (or should be) with the work of Dr. Hans Rosling and his great &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen .html&quot;&gt;bubble plot movies&lt;/a&gt; ala trendalyzer, but those seem to only work when presented by a narrator, and they work really well when the presenter is Hans Rosling. And they aren't 3D. Is there a middle ground between things like the work of a company like &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U&quot;&gt;Xplane&lt;/a&gt; and static, non-moving visual images? In short, is there a way to engage our audience with rotating, moving, three dimensional images while also providing high-quality, insightful, information visualization?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lastly, please know that I'm not advocating 3D or Xplane type visualizations here. I've yet to find a place for 3D in any of my work and the Xplane movies, while fun to watch, don't seem to stick. I'm simply asking a question and looking for feedback from a group of information visualizers whose opinions I respect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John C. Munoz&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bzintelguru.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bzintelguru.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=63850&quot;&gt;Visual narrative&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3698101</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>jmunoz</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>DataViz Resource in Germany</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3692502</link>
		<description>I recently came across Rolf Hichert's name in some DataViz research that I was doing.&amp;nbsp; His website&amp;nbsp;( &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.hichert.com&quot; target=_blank target=_blank&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hichert.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hichert.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/A&gt; ) is nearly all in German, although I did find one document in English - &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.hichert.com/downloads/media/broschueren/brochure_2008_en.pdf&quot; target=_blank target=_blank&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hichert.com/downloads/media/broschueren/brochure_2008_en.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hichert.com/downloads/media/broschueren/brochure_2008_en.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;agrees very much&amp;nbsp;with the principles that&amp;nbsp;those who are on the Perceptual Edge adhere too.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;wd&lt;BR&gt; &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=38298&quot;&gt;New topic proposals&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3692502</guid>
		<pubDate>Thur, 01 Oct 2009 16:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>wd</author>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>&quot;Visualizing 1 in 8,000&quot;</title>
		<link>http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3680358</link>
		<description>I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://stickyslides.blogspot.com/2009/09/visualizing-1-in-8000.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;Visualizing 1 in 8,000&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Jan Schultink (image from his article attached) interesting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Initially, I think it is effective at making a point, but I worry that it may be misleading.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think? &lt;p&gt;Forum: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=63850&quot;&gt;Visual narrative&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfew.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3680358</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<author>joemako</author>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>